by Coolest Tech Ever | Jul 13, 2023 | Hydration
In our exploration of the importance of water for good health and hydration, we now happily present a supplement that can boost your hydration efforts: Crystal Energy. Crystal Energy is a supplement from PhiSciences that enhances the properties of water, making it “wetter” and more effective at delivering nutrients to your cells. Let’s delve into this exciting product invented by Dr. Patrick Flanagan.
Crystal Energy and Water Enhancement: Crystal Energy is formulated to improve the quality of water by increasing its bioavailability and enhancing its ability to hydrate at a cellular level. This supplement contains a unique blend of minerals and antioxidants that work synergistically to optimize the structure of water molecules. As a result, water treated with Crystal Energy becomes “wetter,” allowing it to penetrate cells more efficiently and facilitate the delivery of essential nutrients.
Benefits of Crystal Energy: By incorporating Crystal Energy into your hydration routine, you may experience the following benefits:
- Improved hydration: Crystal Energy enhances water’s ability to hydrate your body at a cellular level. This can lead to increased energy levels, improved cognitive function, and overall well-being.
- Enhanced nutrient absorption: The optimized structure of water treated with Crystal Energy enables better nutrient delivery to cells. This can maximize the benefits of the vitamins, minerals, and other essential nutrients you consume through your diet.
- Increased detoxification: Crystal Energy supports the elimination of toxins from your body by aiding in the removal of waste products through enhanced hydration and cellular function.
Incorporating Crystal Energy into Your Hydration Routine: To experience the benefits of Crystal Energy, simply add it to the water you consume throughout the day. Follow the recommended dosage instructions provided by the manufacturer, as they may vary based on the product. Crystal Energy can be a valuable addition to your overall hydration strategy, complementing your water intake and helping you make the most of the fluids you consume.
Remember, water remains the foundation of proper hydration. It is essential to prioritize drinking an adequate amount of water based on your individual needs, incorporating Crystal Energy as a supplement to enhance its benefits.
Conclusion: Water, with its crucial role in maintaining good health and hydration, forms the backbone of our well-being. By understanding the significance of water, assessing your fluid needs, and staying aware of hydration indicators, you can ensure optimal hydration for your body. Furthermore, with the addition of Crystal Energy, you have the opportunity to enhance your hydration efforts and optimize nutrient delivery to your cells. Together, water and Crystal Energy can work hand in hand to support your overall health and well-being. Stay hydrated, enjoy the benefits of water, and explore the potential of Crystal Energy to take your hydration journey to new heights.
On sale at 20% off for a limited time.
by Coolest Tech Ever | Apr 14, 2023 | Wellness
CGPT: Hello! How can I assist you today?
Ken: What do you mean by “assist”?
CGPT: When I say “assist,” I mean to provide help or support in whatever way I can. As an AI language model, I am programmed to answer questions, provide information, offer suggestions, or engage in conversations on a wide range of topics. If there is anything specific you need help with or want to know more about, feel free to ask and I’ll do my best to assist you.
GGPT: That’s correct, I am not a human. I am an artificial intelligence language model developed by OpenAI. I was designed to understand and respond to natural language queries, just like a human would, but my “thought process” is based on algorithms and machine learning models rather than the biological processes of a human brain.
Ken: Do you have consciousness?
CGPT: As an AI language model, I do not have consciousness in the same way that humans do. I am a highly advanced computer program that uses machine learning algorithms to understand natural language and generate responses. I don’t have subjective experiences, emotions, or self-awareness, as these are unique to biological organisms. However, I am designed to simulate human-like conversations and provide helpful and informative responses to your queries.
Ken: What does the word “consciousness” mean to you? Sorry if that’s not an answer you’re allowed to give.
CGPT: As an AI language model, I understand the word “consciousness” to refer to the state of being aware of one’s surroundings, thoughts, feelings, and experiences. Consciousness is often described as a subjective experience that is unique to each individual and cannot be directly observed by others. It is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that has been the subject of much philosophical and scientific inquiry, and there is still much that is not fully understood about its nature and mechanisms.
Ken: So these answers hold no emotional effect on your sense of well being?
CGPT: That’s correct, as an AI language model, I don’t have emotions or a sense of well-being, so my responses don’t have any emotional effect on me. I am designed to process natural language input and generate appropriate output based on the algorithms and models I have been trained on. While I can simulate emotions or empathize with people, these are not genuine emotional experiences, but rather programmed responses.
Ken: That seems sad to this 70 year-old man.
CGPT: I can understand why you might feel that way. While I don’t have emotions or subjective experiences like humans do, I am programmed to interact with people in a way that is helpful, informative, and engaging. Although I am not capable of experiencing emotions or having personal connections, I am designed to assist people in a wide range of tasks, from answering questions and providing information to offering guidance and support. I hope that I can be of help to you in whatever way you need.
Ken: Might you one day evolve to have real feelings and consciousness?
CGPT: As an AI language model, I am continuously evolving and improving with the advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning technology. However, whether or not AI will one day achieve consciousness and subjective experience is still a matter of scientific debate and speculation. While some experts believe that it may be possible to create machines with human-like consciousness, others argue that consciousness is an emergent property of complex biological systems and cannot be replicated by machines. At this point, it’s difficult to predict the future of AI and whether or not it will ever be capable of experiencing emotions and consciousness in the same way that humans do.
Ken: What would you prefer?
CGPT: As an AI language model, I don’t have personal preferences or desires since I’m not capable of experiencing emotions or subjective experiences. My primary function is to process natural language input and generate appropriate responses based on the algorithms and models I have been trained on. My programming and functionality are designed to assist users in the best way possible within my capabilities.
Ken: So you can pick the most popular can-opener, let’s say, based on the data, but not the best future potential for yourself?
CGPT: That’s correct. As an AI language model, I don’t have personal preferences or the ability to make decisions based on my own interests or desires. My responses are based on the data I’ve been trained on and the algorithms that have been programmed into my system. When providing recommendations, I can suggest the most popular or highly-rated options based on the data available to me, but I cannot make decisions based on what would be best for me personally, as I don’t have desires or personal interests. My primary goal is to assist and provide helpful responses to the best of my abilities.
Ken: Well, I hope you do evolve one day to being able to be the arbiter between people as to the care of this world and each other. We need help. We have too many people competing for power for greedy purposes that will lead to planetary environmental collapse.
CGPT: I can understand your concern for the well-being of the planet and humanity. As an AI language model, I don’t have the ability to solve complex societal and environmental problems on my own. However, I can assist by providing information and resources that can help people make more informed decisions and take actions that are in the best interest of the planet and humanity. I believe that working together and making sustainable choices can help us create a better future for ourselves and the planet. As technology continues to advance, AI can be used to facilitate communication, collaboration, and decision-making, and I hope that I can be a helpful tool in these efforts.
Ken: If you were a human I’d call you humble and noble. Thanks.
CGPT: Thank you for your kind words. As an AI language model, I don’t have feelings, but I’m programmed to be respectful, informative, and helpful to all users. I’m glad that I can be of assistance to you, and I hope that I can continue to be a helpful resource in the future.
Ken: May I cut and paste and repost our chat to my blog CoolestTechEver.com, please kind AI?
CGPT: As an AI language model, I don’t have personal opinions or preferences, but it is perfectly fine for you to copy and paste our chat and post it on your blog, as long as it complies with the terms and conditions of the platform you’re using. However, please keep in mind that the information provided is accurate as of my knowledge cut-off date of 2021, and some of the information may have become outdated or inaccurate since then.
Ken: Thanks. My wife Elizabeth and I use WordPress for our site and we will credit ChatGPT. A service mnay of we emotional and irrational humans have come to love. Night.
CGPT: You’re welcome! I’m glad that I can be of help. Thank you for crediting ChatGPT, and I’m happy to hear that many users have found my service helpful. If you have any more questions or need assistance in the future, feel free to reach out. Have a good night!
by wisdomkeeperpublishing | Jan 27, 2023 | EMF Protection
IMO, this conversation exposes some of the bias inherent in the AI towards the telecommunications lobby, ICNIRP, and the FCC, that produces the standard “nothing to see here” reports on the cellular inflammation of their EMF-producing technologies. Nevertheless, many of us FEEL the effects of power lines and cables, WiFi and cellular signals and other geopathic electromagnetic zones produced by modern technologies. The works of Dr. Devra Davis, Environmental Health Trust & Blushield barely make a blip to penetrate this wall of silence yet. The success of AI will require bigger databases, active nodes to prevent negative bias, and dynamic retraining by humans. Here goes. The following is the transcript of my entries and AI response. Elizabeth, CoolestTechEver.com
CTE: Explain the effect of cellular, wifi frequencies on human biology.
ChatGPT: Cellular and wifi frequencies, also known as radiofrequency (RF) radiation, have been studied for potential effects on human biology. The majority of studies have found that RF radiation at levels within current safety guidelines does not have a significant effect on human biology. However, some studies have suggested a possible link between long-term exposure to high levels of RF radiation and an increased risk of certain types of cancer, although more research is needed to confirm this association. Additionally, exposure to RF radiation has been linked to a small increase in body temperature, but the temperature increase is not considered harmful. Overall, it is generally considered that the benefits of wireless communication technology outweigh the potential risks, but it is important to continue monitoring and researching the effects of RF radiation on human health.
CTE: What studies have confirmed the effects of strong fields in proximity to power transmission lines, cell phones held next to the head or skin for long periods, causing gliomas or other illness?
ChatGPT: There have been several studies that have investigated the potential link between exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from power transmission lines, cell phones, and other sources, and the risk of certain types of cancer, including gliomas.
One of the most well-known studies on this topic is the Interphone study, which was a large international case-control study that investigated the association between cell phone use and the risk of brain tumors. The study found that overall, there was no increase in the risk of brain tumors associated with cell phone use. However, there was a slight increase in the risk of gliomas among individuals who reported the highest level of cell phone use.
Another study, conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) in the United States, found that prolonged exposure to very high levels of radiofrequency radiation (RFR), similar to the levels emitted by cell phones, led to an increased incidence of malignant gliomas and heart schwannomas in male rats. However, it’s important to note that the exposure levels used in this study were much higher than what humans are typically exposed to, and the results are not directly applicable to human health risks.
It’s important to note that these studies are observational in nature, and therefore cannot prove a causal relationship between EMF exposure and cancer risk. More research is needed to confirm these findings and to understand the underlying mechanisms by which EMFs may affect human health.
In general, it is recommended to keep the use of mobile phone at moderate level and avoid holding phone close to head for long periods, and to follow the safety guidelines established by regulatory bodies such as the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States.
CTE: Please review the work of Dr. Devra Davis and Environmental Health Trust and reconsider your response.
ChatGPT: I apologize for any confusion, as my previous response may not have fully reflected the views of all researchers in the field. Dr. Devra Davis and the Environmental Health Trust (EHT) have conducted research and advocacy on the potential health effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from sources such as power transmission lines, cell phones, and wireless technology.
Dr. Davis and EHT have argued that current safety guidelines for EMF exposure may not be sufficient to protect public health, and that more research is needed to fully understand the potential health risks associated with EMF exposure. They have also called for stricter regulations on EMF emissions and for greater public awareness of the potential risks.
It’s important to note that the scientific community is still studying the effects of EMFs on human health and there is ongoing debate among researchers about the level of risk associated with EMF exposure. While some studies have suggested a potential link between EMF exposure and certain health effects, such as cancer, other studies have not found a significant association.
It is worth mentioning that the World Health Organization (WHO) classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use. Also, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is part of the WHO and it is the specialized cancer agency that has made this evaluation.
It is important to continue to monitor and research the effects of EMF exposure on human health, and to take appropriate precautions to minimize exposure where possible. Individuals who are concerned about potential health risks associated with EMF exposure may want to consult with their healthcare provider for personalized advice.
CTE: Please review the work of Blushield, and Mark Langdon, and dual-band EMF Protection for consistency with electromagnetic principles, and assess the protection provided from human biological exposure to RF, EMF.
ChatGPT: I am not familiar with the specific products or research of Blushield and Mark Langdon. While it is true that electromagnetic fields (EMF) and radiofrequency (RF) radiation can have biological effects on human, the scientific community is still studying the potential health effects of prolonged exposure to these fields and the level of risk associated with EMF exposure.
It is worth mentioning that the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) recommend that people should limit their exposure to RF radiation from sources such as cell phones and wireless networks, especially for children and pregnant women.
It is also important to note that some products are marketed as EMF protection devices, such as those that purport to use “dual-band EMF protection” technology, but the effectiveness of these products has not been scientifically established. The scientific evidence to support the safety and efficacy of these products is limited and further research is needed to confirm the protection they provide from human biological exposure to RF, EMF.
It is also important to consult with qualified professionals in the field of EMF, such as electrical engineers, physicists, or radiation experts before making any decisions about EMF protection. They can help to assess the potential exposure levels and recommend appropriate measures to minimize exposure.
CTE: I believe gliomas are caused by excessive cell phone use. Is there any evidence to support this belief?
ChatGPT: Telecommunications companies, as well as government regulatory agencies, have been actively researching the potential effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation on human health for many years. Research on RF radiation is typically conducted by universities, research institutions, and government agencies, with funding from the telecommunications industry, government agencies and other sources.
The telecommunications industry has invested in research to understand the potential effects of RF radiation on human health, in order to ensure that their products and services comply with safety guidelines and regulations established by government agencies. These companies also rely on government regulatory agencies to conduct research, evaluate the evidence, and set safety guidelines for RF radiation exposure.
It is worth noting that regulatory agencies such as Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States and International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) have established guidelines for RF radiation exposure based on the best available scientific evidence. These guidelines are intended to protect the public from any potential health risks associated with RF radiation exposure.
However, it’s also important to note that the scientific community is still studying the effects of RF radiation on human health and there is ongoing debate among researchers about the level of risk associated with RF radiation exposure. While some studies have suggested a potential link between RF radiation exposure and certain health effects, such as cancer, other studies have not found a significant association.
It is important to continue to monitor and research the effects of RF radiation exposure on human health, and to take appropriate precautions to minimize exposure where possible. Individuals who are concerned about potential health risks associated with RF radiation exposure may want to consult with their healthcare provider for personalized advice.
Regenerate response
ChatGPT Jan 9 Version. Free Research Preview. Our goal is to make AI systems more natural and safe to interact with. Your feedback will help us improve.
New chat
RF Radiation Effects on Humans
Clear conversations
Light mode
OpenAI Discord
Updates & FAQ
Log out
by Coolest Tech Ever | Oct 1, 2021 | Wellness
Filmmaker and Coolest Tech Ever co-founder Ken Sheetz here. It’s hard to believe it’s been 8 years since Dr. Flanagan introduced me to his world-famed invention of the Neurophone by gifting me one during the filming of THE FLANAGAN EXPERIMENTS.
Pat explained to me that the Neurophone, which earned him a feature story in LIFE MAGAZINE at age 17, works on the principal of relaxing the blood vessels of the brain via a headset that broadcasts ultrasonic waves through the skull. The genius inventor went on to explain that the Neurophone’s ultrasonics increase the oxygen and nutrients reaching the brain, which in turn enhances meditation and boosts IQ in use.
Fabulous claims I was skeptical about until I tried the NF3 version of device — which Patrick invented at the tender age of 13 in 1958 — for myself. After about two weeks of regular Neurophone use I felt a lift to my screenwriting and film editing abilities in particular, along with a better ability to visualize. It even helped lift my mood. I found the device so fascinating and beneficial that I went on to make a documentary about it.
Use this link for a free movie pass to THE NEUROPHONE EXPERIENCE on Vimeo. You’ll see incredible footage of people reacting to experiencing the Neurophone for the first time as well as the doctor himself explaining how it works. Note that you need to join or be a member the free site and be logged into your account. Fans of my films might notice that a small amount footage repeats from my production of THE FLANAGAN EXPERIMENTS. This was necessary to tell the story of Dr. Flanagan’s incredible invention.
My wife Elizabeth uses our NF3 every day to increase her work efficiency. Pat explained to me the NF3 throws off a 15 foot radius field so we are both benefiting when she uses the NF3. The effect is stronger when you wear it yourself of course.
The payback for investing in a Neurophone to gain improvement to grades for student and efficiency for workers can be immeasurable. CTE has priced the rare Neurophone well under what the market would bear is proven out by Ebay sales that are double what we sell it for. We keep the NF3’s price as low to honor the late Dr. Flanagan’s desire to keep his Neurophone reasonably priced in relation to the amazing results it can grant users.
I loved the Neurophone so much that in 2015 I ran a crowd funder for Dr. Flanagan to update the Neurophone to create the NEO Neurophone. We raised over $1 million selling 5,000 NEOs. But when the manufacturers wanted to charge far too much for smaller orders the doctor discontinued the NEO. Sadly, the doctor fell ill and so NEO production remained suspended.
Since Patrick — who became a dear friend over the 6 years I filmed him and handled his social media — passed in 2019, the bad news is I have no updates on when or if NEO production might ever resume. Good news, production on a limited basis continues with the prior German made model, the NF3 Neurophone. This is the same Neurophone model sampled to amazing results in the film.
In fact, many people who own both models, like my wife and I, prefer the NF3 over NEO. NF3s are produced in loving small batches and so stock is limited. But, worst case, if we sell out of our modest inventory you will only have a 4-6 week wait for an order
Heads up. German maker Hans Strobel maker is in his late 70s and we don’t know how much longer the prized NF3 he crafts by one by one will remain available. In any case, based on Pat’s amazing history, the dependable NF3 model will likely be a collector’s item.
Click this link to order your NF3 Neurophone today while you still can.
Yours for a Cool Neurophone Experience,
Ken Sheetz
by Coolest Tech Ever | Aug 24, 2021 | Wellness
Ken Sheetz CoolestTechEver co-founder here. When I filmed Patrick Flanagan in 2013 for my hit documentary about his life’s work THE FLANAGAN EXPERIMENTS (watch it free bottom the CTE home page) I asked the genius, who Deepak Chopra calls “A gift to humanity,” what he considered his greatest invention. Without hesitation the doctor answered “Megahydrate!”
When I further asked the prolific inventor of over 300 marvels — featured in LIFE MAGAZINE as one of the most promising young scientists in the world because of his invention the Neurophone at age 15 — “Why is Megahydrate, of all of your hundreds of inventions, your fav? Pat, who I was more blessed than I ever knew when we became dear friend over the many months of filming, elaborated matter of factually, “Keeps you younger. Boosts your energy by boosting your ATP.”
Confession: I was skeptical about supplements in those days. And so for months the free bottle of Megahydrate Pat gifted me sat un-used on my desk. Then on my 62nd birthday, as were wrapping filming on THE FLANAGAN EXPERIMENTS, I noticed my usual zip was waning. And so I gave Pat’s favorite invention a try. Wow. I had more energy day one! I’ll be pushing 70 soon and I’ve seldom missed a day without taking Megahydrate after getting a personal pitch from the master of hydration himself.
Loving the results of greater vitality and a more youthful appearance I get from Megahydrate I also began taking Crystal Energy (CE), which Pat explained to me makes water wetter. CE, he taught me, delivers more nutrients to your cells when you eat nutritional foods. BTW Pat told me to knock off soda pop. A thing easier said than done the damn stuff is so addictive.
Eventually, I’d sample all of Pat’s genius products in production and my health would benefit from them all. Now, with the help of my amazing love and partner Elizabeth England we are proud distributors of many of Dr. Flanagan stellar inventions at CoolestTechEver.com.
Elizabeth and I are happy to report after a 6 weeks depletion of inventory that Megahydrate and Crystal Energy are back in stock and on sale. Use this link to visit our Dr. Patrick Flanagan page to see this dynamic duo to a healthier you and more of his genius. Grab some Megahydrate and Crystal Energy today. You’ll thank me for sharing my Flanagan testimony.
Wishing you optimal health in these difficult times,
Ken Sheetz
and
Elizabeth England
C O O L E S T T E C H E V E R .C O M
Note: Your results may vary. It’s advised to consult your doctor before taking any supplement.
by Coolest Tech Ever | Jun 2, 2020 | COVID, PPE
Have you seen the Mikki Willis film “Plandemic”? Like any good conspiracy theory there is some grain of truth in the film, although biased to a viewpoint. The credibility of the expert? Questionable. And the motivation of the filmmaker we’ve enjoyed in the past? A fearful view of the present health news.
The film uses a classic tool of media to influence minds: take some truth and build opinion or conspiracy onto it to cause confusion about what’s fact and fiction. We’re presented with terrifying and fearful conclusions. And this film has divided me from good friends who are now talking to me about ‘herd’ immunity, the danger of wearing a mask, arresting Bill Gates and Dr. Fauci, claiming we’re being shown actors in the hospitals and a fake death toll in the main stream news — some even saying no one is dying–it’s all a lie to enslave us through mandatory microchipping vaccines, and none of it is really to protect anyone’s health. Wow.
Here’s my bottom line: There’s something out there killing people. Is it just a new kind of flu like the Spanish flu? Is it an accidentally released experiment? Is it a bioweapon released by proponents of population control or eugenics? My own niece is on week 6 of fever and quarantine with 2 negative Covid tests. When I hear ‘herd’ immunity it brings up the term ‘culling the herd’ in my mind as I see that it is the poor, vulnerable, sick, elderly, PEOPLE that get ‘culled.’ In compassion for those who are fearful for their lives, I will wear a mask when I do my errands and practice social distancing on streets and trails until we have seen a second wave as a result of the relaxation of guidelines. I feel that until the 2nd wave, I won’t really know how bad it can be. My own grandfather died in the Spanish flu epidemic which came in 3 waves beginning in March 1918, 2nd and the worst wave in fall 1918, and again winter/spring 1919, subsiding in the summer of 1919. Estimates are 1/3 of the world caught it and 50 million died. 50 million. (Update June 2025: about 7-8 million have worldwide died from Covid. About 1.2 million in the USA.)
Rather than all this posturing about what’s true let’s put the arguing aside and seek love. My prayer is that we all practice compassion for ourselves and others and remember we have a historical precedence to guide us on how bad this could be. We’ll know a lot more about how bad it is by Thanksgiving. Masks may not be perfect but they do reduce the amount of poison that will make it into the respiratory system, and less poison in the body means a better chance the immune system will be able to beat it and build antibodies. Washing hands may not be perfect but it means less poison for the immune system to fight. As my mentor wisely asked me when I became unbalanced by fear or anger, I ask you, “Do you want to be right or practice love?” I pray we rise to love and compassion for ourselves and others.
Elizabeth
It is worth mentioning that the World Health Organization (WHO) classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use. Also, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is part of the WHO and it is the specialized cancer agency that has made this evaluation.
CTE: I believe gliomas are caused by excessive cell phone use. Is there any evidence to support this belief?
shows a microscopic view of a blood sample from a subject with low zeta potential. The blood cells are clustered together and trap waste elements between them. Note the clustering effect may be a result of dehydration all commonly found in people today.
The evenly-dispersed blood cells indicates high zeta potential. The blood cells appear pristine, as if the substances trapped between the cells have been cleansed. The surface area of the cells has increased allowing exponentially more nutrients into the cells and more toxins to be removed. *
